Independent research praises BMJ Clinical Evidence as one of the best evidence-based tools for point of care. Clinicians have rated it a highly effective resource to support clinical practice.
An international study highlighting the opinions of BMJ Clinical Evidence users, and the impact it has made on clinical decision making.
These articles assess the benefit of using BMJ Clinical Evidence and contrasting resources across a variety of clinical situations using a number of different delivery formats.
Effectiveness of clinician-selected electronic information resources for answering primary care physicians' information needs.
Citing BMJ Clinical Evidence has a highly regarded medical information resource
Using BMJ Clinical Evidence when performing a literature search
Highlighting BMJ Clinical Evidence as an example of pre-appraised evidence.
Use of BMJ Clinical Evidence results in change to clinical practice
Observational study looking at the impact of BMJ Clinical Evidence on inpatient management of bronchiolitis
Clinical speciality impacts preferences for clinical tools
Usability study: an evaluation of clinical tools for mobile devices (featuring BMJ Clinical Evidence)
Doctors prefer problem- driven evidence based information
Study into the effects of using BMJ Clinical Evidence in a national continuing medical education program in Italy
Online on the spot searching increases use of evidence
Observational study looking at the feasibility of searching online pre-appraised sources during consultation (featuring BMJ Clinical Evidence)
BMJ Clinical Evidence ranked one of the very best evidence based tools for point of care
A systematic evaluation of evidence-based medicine tools for point of care (featuring BMJ Clinical Evidence)
- Case Studies
- Editor in Chief of the Norwegian Electronic Health Library discusses why BMJ Clinical Evidence was an essential purchase for their users
- Norwegian Electronic Health Library
- Norwegian Training Report - September 2007