- In what format is BMJ Clinical Evidence available?
- How much is a subscription?
- How can I subscribe to BMJ Clinical Evidence?
- How can I contact the customer service department?
- Is VAT payable on subscriptions?
- How many questions does BMJ Clinical Evidence cover?
- How do I cite BMJ Clinical Evidence?
- How can I help to promote BMJ Clinical Evidence?
- Can I suggest questions that I would like to see answered?
- What sorts of questions are covered?
- How do you select the questions?
- How do you choose which treatments to cover?
- Which databases do you search?
- How do you filter out poor quality studies?
- How do you ensure that the information is of high quality?
- How does BMJ Clinical Evidence differ from clinical guidelines?
- How is it different from the Cochrane Library?
- How is it different from Evidence-Based Medicine?
- How do I get permission to reuse BMJ Clinical Evidence content?
Online - It is responsive therefore works on any screen size.
Browse our products for full subscription details.
Subscription to BMJ Clinical Evidence is available from this website. A subscription to the online edition is valid for 12 months from the date you subscribe.
Institutions may purchase online site licences separately. A site licence allows access for your whole institution and can include remote access.
You can contact customer services by email . Alternatively, please call
Phone: +44 (0) 207 111 1105
Fax: +44 (0)20 7383 6402
For North and South America
Tel: +1 800 358 6473 toll free
Fax: +1 205 995 1588
All EU countries purchasing site licences, pay-per-view, or season tickets are required to add 20% VAT.
Over 500 clinical questions on the effects of treatments and preventative interventions are addressed.
The following is an example of how BMJ Clinical Evidence topics are cited: Print: Lip GWH, Kamath S. Acute atrial fibrillation. BMJ Clin Evid 2001;5:1-7. Online: Wilt T. Prostate cancer: non-metastatic. BMJ Clinical Evidence [online] 2002 [cited Aug 30]. URL: http//www.clinicalevidence.com/......
Contact us to discuss joint promotion.
If you have a question that suits our format, which we have not examined, please contact us. We will take it into consideration for future issues.
The clinical questions concern the benefits and harms of preventative and therapeutic interventions, with emphasis on outcomes that matter to patients.
Clinical questions are selected for their relevance to clinical practice by section editors and contributors, in collaboration with primary care clinicians and patients. Consultation rates, morbidity and mortality data are also consulted to ensure that important conditions are included.
Before deciding on the treatment for any patient or group of patients, other information needs to be considered together with the information on effectiveness provided here. Examples include economic arguments, patient preferences, and their different levels of baseline risk.
The literature is searched using the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, and occasionally other electronic databases, looking first for good systematic reviews and then for primary studies with designs that are most appropriate for answering the question.
Systematic reviews and individual studies are critically and independently appraised by a clinician and an information specialist for relevance and quality, using a validated criteria similar to those of Sackett et al and those of Jadad. This process means that not all randomised controlled trials or reviews are included. The studies are then also filtered by the author for clinical relevance.
Each topic is peer reviewed by the section editor, at least two external expert peer reviewers, by members of the advisory board, and by an international editorial committee of generalist clinicians with expertise in epidemiology.
Unlike clinical practice guidelines, BMJ Clinical Evidence specifically aims not to make recommendations. The experience of the clinical guideline movement has shown that is near impossible to make recommendations that are appropriate in every situation. BMJ Clinical Evidence provides the raw material for developing locally applicable clinical practice guidelines. BMJ Clinical Evidence reports the current state of the available evidence, and where there are gaps it says so.
The Cochrane Library is a vital building block for BMJ Clinical Evidence, but BMJ Clinical Evidence comes a few steps nearer to the realities of clinical practice. BMJ Clinical Evidence begins with the questions and then looks for the evidence addressing those questions.
BMJ Clinical Evidence is different from Evidence-Based Medicine because it is driven by important clinical questions. Evidence-Based Medicine (and other evidence-based journals) review research as it is published in clinical journals. Both these publications are, however, intended to compliment one another. For further information, visit Evidence-Based Medicine and Evidence-Based Mental Health.
If you wish to reuse or reproduce BMJ Clinical Evidence content, please contact email@example.com. In some cases, a fee may apply.